Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tammi Labrecque's avatar

Is it smart (and accurate) to boil this down to "A great stock market doesn't mean people are doing well. How many stocks do YOU own?" Because honestly, that's kind of where I'm at on this. I'm short on patience with people right now, so the pithier the better. Because I gotta tell you Dan, when someone tells me how great the economy is, and I KNOW that 1) they make 9 bucks an hour and 2) can barely afford gas to get to a job that 3) definitely has not provided them with a 401K, I want to punt them into the sun.

Just me? Anyone? LOL

Expand full comment
PM's avatar

In 2016 the focus on his appalling character allowed his pretense of economic ability to remain intact. The great frustration of the past 4 years has been the lack on a period of intense focus on (1)what is an objectively poor performance and, more importantly, (2)the crushing inequality of Republican policies - meaning that however much the economy grows the majority will get screwed.

In international terms it is really unusual for a party with the policies and record of the Republicans to get such a consistent vote from groups which they so directly disadvantage. Yes the culture war and racism angles have been driven dramatically by the GOP, but there is no other example of such long-term dissonance between core perceptions ("the system always ignores us, we struggle while the rich get richer") and voting for the people who implement the policies you hate.

The picture of Mitch Romney at Baine with money flowing and the 47% controversy is really the only time in decades where Democrats have made this point aggressively.

Something which has been missing in this campaign is enough hard advertising on the 2017 tax cut and the $750.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts